<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kerry got the Patrick treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-patrick-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-patrick-treatment/</link>
	<description>By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevorahLeah</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-patrick-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-39962</link>
		<dc:creator>DevorahLeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-the-patrick-treatment/#comment-39962</guid>
		<description>The Mass. delegation, when doing the roll-call, didn&#039;t even mention Kerry.  They mentioned Deval, Ted Kennedy, JFK, Theresa Murray (who was their spokesperson), etc. but no Kerry.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And MSNBC didn&#039;t even carry the speech-- although they did broadcast it on a delay after midnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mass. delegation, when doing the roll-call, didn&#8217;t even mention Kerry.  They mentioned Deval, Ted Kennedy, JFK, Theresa Murray (who was their spokesperson), etc. but no Kerry.</p>
<p>And MSNBC didn&#8217;t even carry the speech&#8211; although they did broadcast it on a delay after midnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don, American</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-patrick-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-39955</link>
		<dc:creator>Don, American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-the-patrick-treatment/#comment-39955</guid>
		<description>Boy, I&#039;m glad I missed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, I&#8217;m glad I missed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-patrick-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-39947</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/2008/08/28/kerry-got-the-patrick-treatment/#comment-39947</guid>
		<description>Well at least &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/08/28/scratches_in_obamas_glitter/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one pundit&lt;/a&gt; is pointing out the reverse:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;But some Democrats also believe that if the attack strategy prevails, it threatens the very essence of the candidate&#039;s appeal.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Which is apparently what Vennochi actually thinks too:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then, each candidate works feverishly to scratch the glitter off the other before election day. The shooting star must be brought down to earth, destroyed in the name of comparative politics.&lt;br/&gt;Remember? Obama was going to change all that. That was his promise. That&#039;s what made him different.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So Obama risks accusations of inauthenticity by doing A, or being revealed to be just a plain old politician by doing B, or...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Pundit-wise, Obama&#039;s damned if he does, and damned if he doesn&#039;t, no matter what. Thus the pundit-o-mat cancels itself out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least <a HREF="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/08/28/scratches_in_obamas_glitter/" REL="nofollow">one pundit</a> is pointing out the reverse:</p>
<p><i>But some Democrats also believe that if the attack strategy prevails, it threatens the very essence of the candidate&#8217;s appeal.</i></p>
<p>Which is apparently what Vennochi actually thinks too:<br /><i><br />Then, each candidate works feverishly to scratch the glitter off the other before election day. The shooting star must be brought down to earth, destroyed in the name of comparative politics.<br />Remember? Obama was going to change all that. That was his promise. That&#8217;s what made him different.</i></p>
<p>So Obama risks accusations of inauthenticity by doing A, or being revealed to be just a plain old politician by doing B, or&#8230;</p>
<p>Pundit-wise, Obama&#8217;s damned if he does, and damned if he doesn&#8217;t, no matter what. Thus the pundit-o-mat cancels itself out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dankennedy.net @ 2012-02-09 19:15:34 -->
