Truth in labeling

October 8, 2008 at 1:53 pm

I hadn’t noticed this Washington Post feature before, but I love the name of it: “Both Sides,” in which Tucker Carlson and Ana Marie Cox “debate the issues and latest developments.”

Why do I love the name? Because Carlson isn’t really a conservative. And Cox isn’t really a liberal. Both sides of what, exactly?

7 Responses to “Truth in labeling”

  1. Vox says:

    If Tucker Carlson is not a conservative, then what is he?

  2. Aaron Read says:

    Too…many…jokes… flying…into…brain…
    can’t…choose!

  3. Mr Punch says:

    It was ever thus. In the ’70s, we saw Nicholas von Hoffmann (national) and George Frazier (local) represent the “liberal” viewpoint in these point/counterpoints (against James J. Kilpatrick and David Brudnoy, respectively).

  4. Doug Shugarts says:

    Tucker Carlson is the poor man’s George Will. I won’t take credit for that line — I heard it years ago, but can’t find a reference online — yet the remark is spot-on.

  5. Peter Porcupine says:

    DK – Greater Boston puts forward Todd Domke as a Republican, why do you expect accuracy from the Post?

  6. Stella says:

    A few years ago to be “Tucker Carlson’d” was to be bored to tears.

    These labels are phony. They’ve been stretched and twisted to nothingness.

    Both sides now while bounce a ball?

  7. Aaron Read says:

    I wish I could’ve found this link earlier today when I made my previous post about too many jokes flying into my brain at once…but better late than never!

    Mock That Employee!

WordPress Theme Design