<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was birther candidate Hudak going rogue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/</link>
	<description>By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pahre</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-54007</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pahre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-54007</guid>
		<description>Congratulations!  You now have a &quot;political blog&quot;.

The Globe can manage to put the full URL for &quot;Braving the BPS Lottery&quot; blog on the cover of their &quot;g&quot; section today, but they can&#039;t even manage to refer to you in any other way than a &quot;political blog&quot; inside the Metro section.  They&#039;re treating you the same way the Globe treats the Herald when it breaks a story.  Have you even been compared to the Herald?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!  You now have a &#8220;political blog&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Globe can manage to put the full URL for &#8220;Braving the BPS Lottery&#8221; blog on the cover of their &#8220;g&#8221; section today, but they can&#8217;t even manage to refer to you in any other way than a &#8220;political blog&#8221; inside the Metro section.  They&#8217;re treating you the same way the Globe treats the Herald when it breaks a story.  Have you even been compared to the Herald?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike_b1</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53911</link>
		<dc:creator>mike_b1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53911</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, at the Bat Cave in Wrentham, Brown is hoping he didn&#039;t piss Galvin off too badly because he needs to get to DC and distance himself -- literally and figuratively -- from this mess.

You can&#039;t make this stuff up. What a complete hack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, at the Bat Cave in Wrentham, Brown is hoping he didn&#8217;t piss Galvin off too badly because he needs to get to DC and distance himself &#8212; literally and figuratively &#8212; from this mess.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t make this stuff up. What a complete hack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tunder</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53897</link>
		<dc:creator>Tunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53897</guid>
		<description>Tierney is my rep and I have been seeing Hudak signs in my town for at least 5 months. They multiplied with Brown&#039;s recent campaign. Despite the fact the Hudak will (hopefully) come across to most as too far right (especially if his tasteless lawn sign gets some more publicity)he is clearly organized and well supported. Tierney will do well to take notice and not be &quot;Browned.&quot; 

FYI - if that term somehow comes into play and gets used I will want back-up that you heard it here first! Didn&#039;t Pat Riley get a trademark for &quot;3-Peat?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tierney is my rep and I have been seeing Hudak signs in my town for at least 5 months. They multiplied with Brown&#8217;s recent campaign. Despite the fact the Hudak will (hopefully) come across to most as too far right (especially if his tasteless lawn sign gets some more publicity)he is clearly organized and well supported. Tierney will do well to take notice and not be &#8220;Browned.&#8221; </p>
<p>FYI &#8211; if that term somehow comes into play and gets used I will want back-up that you heard it here first! Didn&#8217;t Pat Riley get a trademark for &#8220;3-Peat?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hub Politics » Did Hudak’s Campaign Fake An Endorsement from Scott Brown?</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53896</link>
		<dc:creator>Hub Politics » Did Hudak’s Campaign Fake An Endorsement from Scott Brown?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53896</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Kennedy reports that Scott Brown’s campaign informed him that Brown did not endorse Hudak. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Kennedy reports that Scott Brown’s campaign informed him that Brown did not endorse Hudak. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrybosch</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53891</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrybosch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53891</guid>
		<description>So, I&#039;m confused.

He endorsed Hudack before he didn&#039;t endorse him?

He didn&#039;t approve the release before the release was released?

Be kinda sleazy for him not to endorse someone who worked so tirelessly for his campaign.

But hilarious either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;m confused.</p>
<p>He endorsed Hudack before he didn&#8217;t endorse him?</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t approve the release before the release was released?</p>
<p>Be kinda sleazy for him not to endorse someone who worked so tirelessly for his campaign.</p>
<p>But hilarious either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obi juan</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53888</link>
		<dc:creator>obi juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53888</guid>
		<description>Either Hudak deleted his twitter account or your link is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either Hudak deleted his twitter account or your link is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newshound</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53886</link>
		<dc:creator>Newshound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53886</guid>
		<description>Dan - Your intuition is most likely correct - - - Mr. Browne is deliberately vague. Of course Senator Brown should be focused on a mighty new, big and important job but your question almost obviously is one which they&#039;d choose for you not to ask. Mr. Browne does not want to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; Your intuition is most likely correct &#8211; - &#8211; Mr. Browne is deliberately vague. Of course Senator Brown should be focused on a mighty new, big and important job but your question almost obviously is one which they&#8217;d choose for you not to ask. Mr. Browne does not want to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scutch</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53878</link>
		<dc:creator>Scutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53878</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, Hudak tweets (twitters?) away about his new BFF Scott Brown:

http://twitter.com/Hudak2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, Hudak tweets (twitters?) away about his new BFF Scott Brown:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Hudak2010" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Hudak2010</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/01/21/was-birther-candidate-hudak-going-rogue/comment-page-1/#comment-53877</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=7153#comment-53877</guid>
		<description>Commendations on your follow up work to your previous post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commendations on your follow up work to your previous post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
