<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media Nation &#187; Gawker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dankennedy.net/tag/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dankennedy.net</link>
	<description>By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker&#8217;s slimy hit on Christine O&#8217;Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/10/29/gawkers-slimy-hit-on-christine-odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/10/29/gawkers-slimy-hit-on-christine-odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=8767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will not link, though you&#8217;ll have no trouble finding it if you&#8217;re interested. But I want to join those who are calling out the gossip site Gawker for an item that was slimy even by its own consistently low standards. On Thursday, Gawker posted a piece by an anonymous contributor who claimed to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 153px"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/45/Christine_O%27Donnell_2010.jpg" alt="" width="143" height="190" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Christine O&#39;Donnell</p></div>
<p>I will not link, though you&#8217;ll have no trouble finding it if you&#8217;re interested. But I want to join those who are calling out the gossip site Gawker for an item that was slimy even by its own consistently low standards.</p>
<p>On Thursday, Gawker posted a piece by an anonymous contributor who claimed to have had a one-night stand with Tea Party favorite Christine O&#8217;Donnell three years ago. There was no actual sex in his telling, but the details are pretty embarrassing. Two problems: (1) we have no idea if it&#8217;s true; and, more important, (2) whether true or not, it&#8217;s nobody&#8217;s damn business.</p>
<p>Yahoo! media columnist Michael Calderone has <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101028/bs_yblog_upshot/gawker-editor-defends-anonymous-odonnell-post">a great round-up</a> of outraged reaction to the piece, along with Gawker editor Remy Stern&#8217;s pathetic defense.</p>
<p>O&#8217;Donnell, the longshot Republican Senate candidate in Delaware, is absolutely fair game for her public utterances, including her deservedly mocked statements about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/18/odonnell-witchcraft-politically-incorrect_n_722035.html">dabbling in witchcraft</a>. But what Gawker did on Thursday was beneath contempt.</p>
<p>The sad irony is that this will contribute to public loathing of the media, even though Gawker&#8217;s relationship to journalism is approximately the same as that of the WWE to sports.</p>
<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christine_O'Donnell_2010.jpg"><em>Photo via Wikimedia Commons.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dankennedy.net/2010/10/29/gawkers-slimy-hit-on-christine-odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balloon dad hits the 14:59 mark</title>
		<link>http://www.dankennedy.net/2009/10/17/balloon-dad-hits-the-1459-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dankennedy.net/2009/10/17/balloon-dad-hits-the-1459-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balloon boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dankennedy.net/?p=6483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, we should all be skeptical about checkbook journalism, and Gawker is right up front about having paid Robert Thomas, a former friend and would-be business associate of balloon dad Richard Heene (photo). But if Thomas can be trusted, the picture he paints of Heene is devastating. Thomas portrays Heene as an increasingly paranoid, frantic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6486" title="Richard_Heene_20091017" src="http://www.dankennedy.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Richard_Heene_20091017.jpg" alt="Richard_Heene_20091017" width="168" height="111" />Yes, we should all be skeptical about checkbook journalism, and Gawker is right up front about having paid Robert Thomas, a former friend and would-be business associate of balloon dad Richard Heene (photo).</p>
<p>But if Thomas can be trusted, <a href="http://gawker.com/5383858/exclusive-i-helped-richard-heene-plan-a-balloon-hoax">the picture he paints of Heene</a> is devastating. Thomas portrays Heene as an increasingly paranoid, frantic man who believes shape-shifting reptiles are running the government and who would do anything to get on television.</p>
<p>The two had even talked about perpetrating a hoax with the balloon, Thomas claims, though getting one of the kids involved was supposedly not part of the original plan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_13584589">This story in the Denver Post</a> only adds to the sense that it&#8217;s all about to fall apart.</p>
<p><em>Photo of Heene is from his MySpace profile.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dankennedy.net/2009/10/17/balloon-dad-hits-the-1459-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dankennedy.net @ 2012-02-09 00:06:22 -->
